PROGRESS IN MANAGEMENT OF SEDIMENT BYPASSING AT COASTAL INLETS: NATURAL BYPASSING, WEIR JETTIES, JETTY SPURS, AND ENGINEERING AIDS IN DESIGNIntroduction - Seabergh-Kraus-CEJ-030002Natural Sand Bypassing at InletsFig. 1. Morphologic features at Shinnecock Inlet, New York.Fig. 2. Interpreted sediment-transport pathways at Shinnecock Inlet.Fig. 3. Concept sketch for reservoir inlet morphology model.Fig. 4. Typical elements of a weir jetty system.Table 1. Weir Jetty Costal Inlets in the United States.Hillsboro Inlet, FloridaMasonboro Inlet, North CarolinaFig. 7. Masonboro Inlet, North Carolina, after construction of the south jetty.Ponce De Leon Inlet, FloridaMurrells Inlet, South CarolinaMouth of the Colorado River, TexasFig. 10. Mouth of Colorado River, Texas, January 2001.Deposition basin location and sizeDesign with respect to net long-shore sediment transportFig. 12. Placement of a groin updrift of weir jetty to aid in capturing only net sediment volume in deposition basin.Jetty weir construction material Weir lengthSpur functioningSpur jetty design considerationsTable 2. Spur jetty installations in United States.Spur elevationFig. 15. Currents deflected by Siuslaw River, Oregon, jetty spurs (from Pollock, et al. 1995).Physical modeling of spursFig. 17. Sediment tracer movement due to 3 m, 15 seconds waves, with maximum flood current of 1.4 m/sec in channel.Discussion and Conclusions - Seabergh-Kraus-CEJ-030028Acknowledgments - Seabergh-Kraus-CEJ-030029References - Seabergh-Kraus-CEJ-030030References cont'd - Seabergh-Kraus-CEJ-030031Seabergh-Kraus-CEJ-03