Google+
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Home
Download PDF
Order CD-ROM
Order in Print
Home
>
Costal Inlets Research Program
>
> Fig. 4. Nondimensional run-up versus Iribarren number for regular waves.
Fig. 3. Regular wave relative run-up versus Eq. (38).
Fig. 6. Mase's (1989) data plotted versus Iribarren number.
Hughes-Runup-CEv51
Page Navigation
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
S.A.
Hughes
/
Coastal
Engineering
51 (2004)
10851104
1095
Fig.
4.
Nondimensional
run-up
versus
Iribarren
number
for
regular
waves.
clustered
reasonably
well
for
values
of
Iribarren
Mase
(1989)
listed
120
values
of
2%-run-up
number
below
about
3.0.
At
values
of n
op
N
3.0
elevation
for
milder
slopes
ranging
between
1/30
VtanaV
1/5.
Fig.
6
plots
nondimensional
2%
run-up
(representing
steeper
slopes
and/or
longer
nonbreak-
R
u2%
/H
mo
versus
Iribarren
number
n
op
.
The
solid
line
ing
waves)
scatter
increases
significantly.
Ahrens
et
al.
(1993)
discussed
reasons
for
the
scatter
and
proposed
is
Mase's
best
fit
to the
data
previously
given
by
Eq.
modified
equations (Eqs.
(12)(15))
to reduce the
(20).
A
very
good
fit
is
seen
for
all
but
a
few
points
for
the
steepest
slope at n
op
N
2.5.
scatter
for
nonbreaking
wave
conditions.
Fig.
5.
Ahrens' (1981)
original
2% run-up
data
plotted
versus
n
op
.
Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business
Previous Page
