Home
Download PDF
Order CD-ROM
Order in Print
Home
>
Costal Inlets Research Program
>
> Modeled run-up
Measured run-up and swash depth
Fig. 7. Power spectra of swash depths measured at SWS. (N.B. Vertical scale differs between panels).
Swash_Erikson-etal
Page Navigation
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
L.
Erikson
et
al.
/
Coastal
Engineering
52 (2005)
285302
295
0.042
0.6
0.6
0.12
0.035
0.5
0.5
0.1
B8
C1
0.4
0.028
0.4
0.08
0.3
0.021
0.3
0.06
0.2
0.014
0.2
0.04
0.007
0.1
0.1
0.02
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Time
(s)
Time
(s)
0.07
0.056
1
0.8
0.7
B9
0.8
0.056
0.042
0.6
B10
0.5
0.6
0.042
0.028
0.4
0.4
0.028
0.3
0.2
0.014
0.2
0.014
0.1
0
0
0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Time
(s)
Time
(s)
Fig.
6.
Measured
run-up
lengths
(dashed
lines)
and
swash
depths
at
the
initial
still
water
shoreline
(solid
lines). Bore
heights
and
arrival
times
input
to
model
are
shown
with
downward
pointing
triangles.
(N.B.
Vertical
scale
differs
between
panels).
maximum
run-up
heights
are
substantially
different
depth
precedes
the
variation
of the
run-up.
This
is
for
cases
B8
through
B10
depending
on
whether
important
as the
measurements
taken at the
SWS
swash
interaction
is accounted
for
or
not,
the
vertical
contain
some
part
of the
run-up
signal
due
to the
scales
in
Figs. 9
and
10
are
not
consistent
for
a
given
backwater
returning
to the
SWS.
It is also
apparent
case.
If the
vertical
scales
were
the
same,
much
detail
from
the
peaks
of the
curves,
shown
with
the
solid
between
measured
and
calculated
run-up
lengths
circles on the inset of the
figure,
that there is a
phase
would
not
be
visible
in
Fig.
9
.
Inputs
to the
model
shift
of
less
than
half
a
second
between
the
run-up
and
are
bore
heights
and
their
arrival
time
at the
SWS.
The
swash
depth
at the
SWS.
Furthermore,
there is a
bore
heights
and
arrival
times at the
SWS
are taken at
negative
correlation
between
the
phase
shift
and
the
peaks
of the
time
series
in
Fig.
6
as
depicted
by the
incident
wave
period
so that the
greater
the
incident
downward
facing
triangles.
Up-rush
leading
edge
wave
period,
the
shorter
the
phase
lag.
heights
(yh
u
)
were
estimated by
iteration
of the
5.2.
Modeled
run-up
empirical
equation
presented by
Hughes
(Eqs.
(19)
and
(20),
1992)
:
In
Fig.
9
, measured
run-up
lengths
are
compared
to
yh
u
h
4
z
m
14
s
run-up
lengths
calculated
with
the
model
described in
2
where
h
*=0.21
0.48
x
*
+0.32
x
*
and
x
*
is the
dimen-
Section 3.
Model
results
without
accounting
for
swash
s
interaction
are
shown
in
Fig.
10
. Because
the
sionless
distance
from
the
initial
shoreline
position
to
Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business